Corporate onboarding: a guide to the process

If you work in HR, you know that bringing a new person into the company means making a huge investment in time, budget, and managerial energy.

‍

One of the questions that (too often) goes unanswered is: how much of this investment really depends on how you structureyour company's onboarding process?

‍

According to Gartner, around 50% of candidates selected for a job offer back out before starting. This happens because, after the initial enthusiasm, something breaks down in the process: poorly structured communication, unclear expectations, long waiting times, weak relationship with the future manager.

‍

If the person is unclear about what they will actually be doing, what their priorities will be in the first few months, or how their performance will be measured, the risk increases. 

‍

Considering the consequences, every unsuccessful entry results in:

‍

• repeat selection and recruiting costs;
• wasted management time;
• operational slowdown of the team;
• potential domino effect on the internal climate.

This is why corporate onboarding must be designed as a structured and measurable process.

In this guide, we analyze how to structure an effective corporate onboarding process and how to reduce the risks associated with this step.

‍

What onboarding really is: meaning

‍

Onboarding is a process of progressive alignment between the person, the role, and the organization. We can define it as the creation of clarity in three fundamental areas:

‍

• what is expected of the person in the first few months;
• how decision-making processes and dynamics actually work;
• which behaviors generate value in that specific context.
  
  

The concepts of onboarding and induction are often confused. In reality, there are substantial differences: induction concerns the initial experience, while onboarding concerns the person's ability to become autonomous, productive, and integrated into the organizational system.

‍

On a practical level, effective onboarding answers very concrete questions:

‍

• What are the priorities for the first 30-60-90 days?
• How will performance be evaluated?
• Which errors are tolerable and which are not?
• Who should you contact when doubts or conflicts arise?
  
  

The stages of the corporate onboarding process

‍

If you consider onboarding as a process, you must also accept that it does not end in the first few days. 

‍

One of the most common mistakes, in fact, is to treat it as a single block: an intense first week, followed by gradual disinterest. In reality, each phase of onboarding responds to a specific question:

‍

• Before entry: Is the person truly aligned and ready?
• In the first few weeks: did you understand what was expected of you?
• In the early months: is she becoming independent?
• After the first 90 days: is it generating sustainable value?
  
  

Structuring onboarding in phases allows you to avoid improvisation, distribute responsibilities clearly, and introduce concrete moments of verification. 

Let's get into the specifics and see what steps need to be taken for successful onboarding in a company.

‍

Preboarding

‍

Preboarding is the phase between accepting the offer and the first day of work.

This is a time frame that is often underestimated, but it is strategic because it is precisely at this stage that the person's decision to join the company is consolidated. 

If this phase is poorly managed, the new entrant remains in a zone of uncertainty. 

‍

HOW TO DO IT?

‍

During preboarding, you can take very practical action:

• clarify the priorities for the first 90 days: not just general objectives, but expected results and evaluation criteria;
• Define key contacts: who will be the direct manager, any buddy, HR contacts;
• align expectations regarding roles and responsibilities: it is better to clarify constraints and complexities before joining;
• maintain active and structured contact: scheduled communications reduce uncertainty;
• Prepare the working environment: tools, access, schedule for the first few weeks already planned.
  
  

Operational integration

‍

The first few weeks are when onboarding really gets into full swing.

Many processes focus on the initial welcome, but neglect the phase in which the person must actually "slip into" the role for which they were hired. 

‍

HOW TO DO IT?

‍

In the first few weeks, you can make the operational integration more solid by focusing on a few particularly strategic points:

• Set clear short-term goals (30-60 days): set concrete results, not just activities to be carried out.
• Schedule structured discussions with your manager: frequent feedback exchanges prevent easily correctable mistakes from being repeated over time.
• assign progressive responsibilities: start with observable tasks, gradually increasing autonomy and complexity;
• explicit priority criteria: what is urgent, what is strategic, what can wait;
• Pick up on early signs of misalignment: recurring difficulties, hesitation in decision-making, requests for clarification on aspects that have already been agreed upon.
• ‍

Alignment on role and expectations

‍

After the first few weeks of operation, the most useful step is to check whether the person is working exactly within the scope for which they were hired.

‍

Often , a misalignment of expectations is not due to a lack of skills, but to unclear expectations. For example, the manager expects a certain level of autonomy, while the employee believes they are still in the learning phase. HR thinks the priorities are clear, but the team interprets them differently.

‍

HOW TO DO IT?

‍

To structure this phase effectively, you can take action on a number of specific points:

‍

• formally review the responsibilities of the role: compare what was defined during the selection process with what is actually happening;
• Define performance criteria: what does "doing well" mean in that role in the first 3–6 months?
• check the level of autonomy achieved: which decisions can be made independently and which still require supervision;
• ask for two-way feedback: from the manager to the person and vice versa;
• Identify any skills gaps: distinguishing between the need for training, organizational support, or reprioritization.

Cultural integration

‍

A person may be competent and operationally aligned, but not yet integrated into the cultural system of the organization.

‍

Cultural integration involves understanding unwritten rules: for example, how decisions are actually made, how much autonomy is valued, how mistakes and conflicts are handled, and what leadership style is considered effective.

‍

This phase is often left to spontaneous adaptation, even though it is actually one of the steps that has the greatest impact on engagement and retention in the early months.

‍

HOW TO DO IT?

‍

To support cultural integration, you can take structured action:

‍

• explains operational values, not just stated values: how they translate into day-to-day work management;
• facilitates cross-functional relationships: meetings with key stakeholders beyond the direct team;
• Make decision-making models clear: are the models centralized, participatory, data-driven? Clarify this point.
• Share concrete examples of expected behaviors: what is rewarded and what causes "friction."
• Plan moments for discussing the experience: asking "What surprised you?" is often more useful than a standard questionnaire.

Monitoring and feedback

‍

At this point, onboarding should no longer be perceived as an "initial" phase, but as an evolving process. 

‍

Many organizations wait for the first formal performance review. In the meantime, however, important signs may already have emerged, such as recurring difficulties, misunderstandings about priorities, or autonomy that has not yet been consolidated.

‍

READ ALSO:

‍

Quite quitting and quite hiring: what they are and how to recognize them

‍

HOW TO DO IT?

‍

Here's how to make monitoring truly effective:

• structured checkpoint program at 30-60-90 days: with clear objectives and evaluation criteria;
• Actively involve the line manager: feedback cannot be delegated solely to HR.
• Gather two-way feedback: what is working and what can be improved in the onboarding process.
• evaluate the autonomy achieved in relation to initial expectations: not only the activities carried out, but also the quality of decision-making;
• connect any gaps to concrete development plans: training, coaching, redefinition of priorities.

Corporate onboarding and skills: what to really evaluate

‍

When a new person joins the company, you assume that the skills assessed during the selection process are sufficient. In reality, the actual context is different from the interview, because here the dynamics, constraints, and operational priorities change. 

In the first few months, you can determine whether there is consistency between the profile and the role.

During onboarding, you can distinguish between three very different situations:

1. skills gap: the person needs training or targeted coaching;
2. role mismatch: the skills possessed are not those actually required by the context;
3. integration problem: technical skills are there, but cultural or relational alignment is weak.
   
   

Confusing these three scenarios leads to ineffective interventions. If the problem is a technical gap, development is needed. If it is a mismatch, an organizational decision is needed. If it is cultural, realignment and feedback are needed.

In this sense, onboarding is also a phase of assessment in the field.

‍

What is the link between assessment and onboarding?

‍

If onboarding is also a phase for assessing skills, then you cannot assume that what you evaluated during the selection process is sufficient to guarantee performance in a real-world context.

‍

Integrating a skill assessment at the beginning of the onboarding process allows you to reduce the risk of mismatch in a structured way. Not to "re-examine" the person, but to:

‍

• validate key skills in relation to the actual role;
• identify gaps before they impact performance;
• develop a personalized development plan based on evidence rather than perceptions.
  
  

Skillvue supports this transition through assessments based on psychometric science, situational questions, and BEI (Behavioral Event Interview) methodologymethodology. During the onboarding phase, this means observing how the person reasons when faced with concrete scenarios and comparing their profile with the skills actually required for the role.

‍

This way, you will be able to:

• developing targeted development paths in the early months;
• collect objective data useful for future internal mobility decisions;
• reduce the risk of promotions or reallocations based on impressions.
  
  

If you want to make decisions about new hires based on actual skills rather than just expectations, Skillvue's Skill Assessments can be a concrete first step. To learn more, start here.

‍